Time to Relegate Anti-Stigma to the Garbage Heap – Part Two

By Dr David Laing Dawson

There is a moment for most of us sometime in second year University studying linguistics, humanities, philosophy, psychology when questions of truth, reality and delusions become quite interesting. Is there really a difference between the man who believes the CIA is watching him (assuming they are not) and the man who believes Jesus turned water into wine without the aid of grapes and fermentation.

Is what we call a delusion just a lived experience no different than a thousand other unfounded beliefs the rest of us live by? Is it just a social judgment by which we differentiate?

The answer is no. Though it may not be readily apparent to other than a family member or someone who has spent years treating schizophrenia.

First of all the delusion, the false belief of the schizophrenic is almost always tormenting: being watched, controlled, denigrated, persecuted. And when it is not that, when it endows the schizophrenic with a power to right these wrongs, it is dangerous.

And secondly, most clearly differentiating a delusion from an ordinary unfounded belief is the accompanying cognitive deficit.

This is not a cognitive deficit that shows up on an IQ test. This is rather a more subtle and complex social information processing deficit. It is a deficit in the ability to stay grounded in this social moment including having a governing awareness of the effect we are having on others and of the consequences of what we say and do. It is this deficit that differentiates the disheveled man ranting about God on the street corner and the Jehovah’s witness knocking politely on my door.

Schizophrenia is a brain illness for which we have effective treatment.

And as Marvin points out, stigma is not reduced by railing against it. When the subject of the stigma is a frightening illness, stigma is reduced by naming that illness, understanding that illness, and ensuring that it is treated.

3 thoughts on “Time to Relegate Anti-Stigma to the Garbage Heap – Part Two

  1. It is a good decision to get off the stigma train. I always felt it was a waste of money that could have been spent on scientific research. Paying so much for stigma studies would have been better spent or the mistakes of suggesting that stigma somehow caused these chronic human brain brain diseases-thus adding more unscientific social theories to the conversation. (Not to mention the cost of hiring staff.to propagate a wrong assumption with “no evidence services”.which they propose..


  2. As for me, I would prefer that anti -stigma money be diverted to treatment . Treatments are not perfect, but they often relieve the torturing symptoms. Understanding the disease through scientific work, yes ,but we must use the current treatment tools in the here and now. Too often patients are not receiving treatment.


    1. This spring Queen’s students did a stunt . They bashed up a car marked with the slogan “stigma” They imported an old car to campus and daubed it with stigma and then aggressively bashed it up .

      It was a mindless exercise and appeared on the front of the Whig Standard See my letter Friday, April 5 2019 Certainly many members of the public felt it was stupid and some persons who have serious mental illnesses, thought it embarrassing. The law of unintended consequences !


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s